
Maris Kreizman discusses the obstacles within the book industry for debut novels.
Read More
In today's market, emphasizing instinct over data can seem counterintuitive, yet the essence of creating art lies beyond mere statistics. The qualities that elevate great books are often intangible; they resonate when encountered. However, the commercial landscape operates differently.
The current dynamics exemplify the book industry's struggle with debut novels. Publishers are often hesitant to invest in new authors lacking established track records, especially when social media presence holds little weight. While a well-connected author might garner endorsements from established writers, the primary consideration remains the manuscript itself. Ultimately, it’s about the chance to introduce fresh voices and the hope that their narratives will resonate with readers.
In the early 2000s, during my time as an assistant at Simon & Schuster, I learned about the “make book,” a project that an editor was passionate about cultivating into a success. The potential for a make book does not hinge on the author's fame or the concept's marketability; instead, it relies on the execution of the idea. Editors strive to generate enthusiasm within the sales and marketing teams and propel the book into the market.
The concept of the make book embodies optimism: the belief that a publisher, through dedication and teamwork, can transform a book into a bestseller. However, several factors are essential for this to happen: a publisher willing to invest time and resources, a supportive corporate culture that values artistic creation, an editorial team's intuition about the book's potential, and a faith in the market's ability to recognize and uplift quality literature.
Successful examples of make books include Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer and Curtis Sittenfeld’s Prep. In observing the trajectories of these authors, it is evident that the aim should not merely be a successful debut but the foundation of a sustainable literary career.
Many make books face challenges; achieving a hit requires favorable conditions, and even committed publishers cannot control market forces. Conversely, flashy million-dollar debuts often fade from memory, as titles like Yesteryear illustrate. Notably, a debut with a substantial advance typically needs to achieve immediate success, while those with modest advances often qualify as make books deserving of dedicated attention and support from publishers aiming to cultivate new voices.
Corporate consolidation within the publishing landscape has made it increasingly difficult for make books to succeed. At larger publishing houses, employees may only endorse one title from multiple imprints, limiting the opportunity to promote various beloved projects. Sales and marketing teams, inundated with hundreds of new titles each season, often lack the bandwidth for personalized pitches.
As opportunities grow scarce at major publishers, smaller independent presses are stepping up to champion new authors. The recent announcement of Catapult Books closing at the end of the month highlights this troubling trend. Over its decade-long run, Catapult nurtured numerous writers, including Lauren Oyler and Nicole Chung, allowing them to grow before moving to larger publications.
Before Percival Everett received a significant advance from Random House for James, Graywolf, an independent press, provided him with the freedom to hone his craft. Similarly, Annie Hartnett, now recognized for her recent novel The Road to Tender Hearts, began her career at Tin House. A thriving network of small presses is vital for developing new talent and fostering a balanced publishing ecosystem. However, with another small press shutting down, the outlook for nurturing emerging voices within the industry appears increasingly grim.